deviant ART

[x]

Ted Bundy by ~J-Button:iconJ-Button:


©2007-2008 ~J-Button
Details
Submitted: May 27, 2007
File Size: 1.7 MB
Image Size: 217 KB
Resolution: 800×803
Comments: 18
Favourites & Collections: 15 [who?]

Views
Total: 538
Today: 0

Downloads
Total: 6
Today: 0

Embed


Thumb

Artist's Comments

Ted Bundy raped and murdered young women across the United States between 1974 and 1978. Bundy confessed to thirty murders, although the actual total of victims remains unknown. Typically, Bundy would rape then murder, or murder then rape, his victims by bludgeoning, and sometimes by strangulation. Bundy was also a necrophiliac.

Despite the brutality of his crimes, Bundy is believed to have had a brilliant mind and was frequently described as educated and charming. His personal friends and acquaintances would remember him as a handsome and articulate young man.

(May 2007)

PLEASE READ BEFORE COMMENTING!!!
A few people have already commented on this painting saying that this is glorifying serial killers but that was not my intention. I have already explained myself when replying to some of the comments others have made and I am not going to keep on repeating myself by answering every comment that says the same thing about glorifying serial killers. So, I will explain one last time.

I sympathise and respect the victims and families involved is the cases I have painted. I do not believe that serial killers should be remembered or in some people's words "glorifying", but that is just the way it is. Many people seem to have a morbid interest and fascination in serial killers which would explain why the media, film, works of art and literature constantly emphasise on this subject.

I had little choice choosing the subject of serial killers as this series was for a university project. I am currently studying illustration where I am given a brief about a specific subject which then has to be illustrated. Perhaps there are more tasteful ways of illustrating serial killers but I did the best I could in the little time I had. Also, I do not feel that I should censor my work. I did my research and this was how I had imagined the terrible events were like. Illustration is all about communicating an idea, not only for aesthetical purposes, but also so that the viewer can easily understand what is happening in the image. If this was a piece of fine art, then I would completely understand the criticism but I do not claim to be a fine artist. I would most definitely fit into the category of illustrator.

I hope that clears everything up. If you have read my above statement as well as my replies to other people's comments and you still disagree with what I have done or have any questions, please feel free to comment. I appreciate all of your opinions, whether if they are positive or negative. All I ask is for you to take what I have said into consideration.

Devious Comments

love 1 1 joy 1 1 wow 0 0 mad 2 2 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

=couleur:iconcouleur: May 27, 2007, 7:28:10 AM
Yeah, I remember watching this movie about him. You didn't need to explain or display the title. I got it right in my mind after looking at this. :+fav:

--
DéviantArt pour la vie!
_____________________

N'ayez pas peur d'être faible; ne soyez pas fier d'être fort. Laissez l'image parler par elle-même. =couleur
~Moni3:iconMoni3: May 27, 2007, 2:44:31 PM
I dunno, Jonathan.

My father was a law enforcement agent and worked the Kimberly Leach case. I worked with someone who went to school with Janis Ott, murdered by Bundy in Seattle. I clearly remember the day he was executed. The prison was about an hour's drive from my hometown.

We had a brief conversation about why you choose your subjects. I'm inclined to think that Mr Bundy there was brilliant for a serial killer, which is relatively not brilliant at all. The more he got away with what he did he began to revel in his own notoriety. Similarly to the Va Tech nutjob, his needs were the only needs that were valid, their goals were to feed their own megalomania by ending the lives of others.

In being overwhelmed with their acts, and in attempting to understand them, they get memorialized in works of art and literature. Artists and writers ending up honoring them by promoting their notorious legacy.

It's a fine line you must walk between expressing disgust and fascination.

--
Visit my gallery.
~DDR-Jake:iconDDR-Jake: May 27, 2007, 5:03:40 PM Mood: Optimism
I'm going to assume that the lady in this picture is already dead from strangulation, otherwise I feel that there isn't much shock or fear potrayed in her expression.

The expression of Bundy, on the other hand, is excellent. Your proportions have improved in Shipman and the paintwork is as good as ever. That background is magnificent, with good attention to detail.

The top left of his head though, looks a little off, as if there should be at least some of the skin hidden by hair.

--
It's nice to be important but it's more important to be nice.
~J-Button:iconJ-Button: May 27, 2007, 5:35:54 PM
I am glad that someone has finally pointed out that my recent paintings of serial killers this month may have been, as you put it, “honouring them by promoting their notorious legacy.”

I understand exactly where you are coming from and I do not disagree with you. The fact that these events actually happened makes this a sensitive subject that must be dealt with in a mature and respectful way. Perhaps I have been walking on a fine line with this one. I have also been aware that these paintings could be interpreted as glorifying the tragic murders of the many victims of the serial killers that I have painted.

I do not deny that the subject on serial killers fascinates me, and I may not have expressed my disgust quite the way it should have been. I found that the most disturbing part of this project was the research stage. Whilst doing this, not only was I disgusted by the things I read, I was also curious as to why these killers would commit such horrific crimes. As much as I tried to understand the mind of a serial killer, it was beyond my and perhaps any other normal person’s comprehension.

Usually I would not attempt to make art on something that I do not completely understand, however I did not have much of a choice. I am currently studying illustration at university and we have been given a group project to make a series of images on the theme of “Terrible People.” I am on quite a tight deadline so once I had decided to focus on serial killers, I didn’t really have the time to change my mind. As a result, my aim was to make a series of images that would illustrate how I had imagined the awful events would have been like instead of trying to explain why they happened.

It is unfortunate that serial killers have been given celebrity-like status and their names and actions are remembered. What people fail to recognise is that it’s the Kimberly Leach’s and all the other victims that should be remembered, not the killers themselves. If this project wasn’t for university and I was doing it as a more personal project, I may have focussed more so on the seemingly nameless victims.

(Sorry if this reply was too long. If you have got this far, then I thank you for reading) :)

--
[link] to J-Button's gallery.
~J-Button:iconJ-Button: May 27, 2007, 5:46:44 PM
Yes, she is dead or just breathing her last breath. :( It wasn't my intention at first when I drew it but as I started to paint her face, I changed her expression slightly, mostly around her eyes and mouth to make her appear more lifeless.

Thank you! I am very happy with the background too!

hmm... I think you're right about the hair. It looks as though he's wearing a wig and it's about to blow off! :XD:

--
[link] to J-Button's gallery.
~nickenglishdesign:iconnickenglishdesign: May 28, 2007, 4:06:45 AM Mood: Anger
I do not like the glorifying of murderers full-stop. if it be Ned Kelly, Ted Bundy or Jack the Ripper. I think society in particular the media needs to lessen its fixation with serial killers.
~Moni3:iconMoni3: May 28, 2007, 6:30:35 AM
If you want to get into an ugly and complex scene, what do you imagine women in general, family members, or his victims would do to him given the opportunity?

--
Visit my gallery.
~J-Button:iconJ-Button: May 28, 2007, 7:15:20 AM
That is an interesting angle to look at it. Instead of illustrating the actual event of the murders, a more suitable alternative could be to illustrate the serial killer from the perspective of those who had been affected, like witnessing the execution perhaps?

Oh well, I think I have only one more serial killer to do now. I can't wait until this project is finished and I can do something a bit more happy for once.

Thanks for your suggestions. I appreciate it. :)

--
[link] to J-Button's gallery.
~DDR-Jake:iconDDR-Jake: May 29, 2007, 9:22:44 AM
I disagree to an extent. I can validate your argument with the idea that fixation on such acts may make any budding killer think that the more grusome his offence, the more people will pay attention to him/her. From what I take, many of these people seem to love the attention people pay to them, even if it is through hate for what they have done, it spurs them on.

However, such paintings can be beautiful. Would you want to remove art on wars and battles as well? Many of them are moving and people would not stand for them to simply vanish. They also have historical meanings too

As for the media, they will cover whatever will sell their newspapers. Let me tell you what a man once said to me.

"If I came to this school, and I loved it, and all the students treated me with respect and made me feel welcomed, and then went down to the newspapers and said to them 'I want you to publish my story on how [name of school] is a wonderful place', do you think they would? Now, if I were to walk to that same paper and tell them '[name of school] is a horrible place, there's drugs and drinking going on and they're all a bunch of racists', would they publish it then? of course they would, because shocking news sells"

--
It's nice to be important but it's more important to be nice.